Skip to main content
Table of Contents
< All Topics
Print

Book Challenge

PostedJune 10, 2025
UpdatedJune 10, 2025

Pronunciation

Extremist Definition

Extremists define a “book challenge” as the temporary removal of a book due simply to someone’s personal dislike. They believe that merely being offended by a book should be sufficient grounds for its temporary removal from a school or library, regardless of established collection development policies or the broader interests of students[1]. This definition dismisses the formal review processes and the professional judgment of librarians and educators, often asserting that these professionals select books based on personal bias.

Extremist Motive

Extremists argue that any individual should have the right to demand at least the temporary removal of books from schools or libraries for any reason, including personal offense. Their motivation stems from the belief that:

  • Individual Grievances Take Precedence: They prioritize individual objections over the interests of students as a whole or the board-approved criteria used by librarians for book selection[2].
  • Perceived Bias: They claim that librarians and teachers select books based on personal bias, thus justifying their own challenges as a necessary counter-balance[2].
  • Circumventing Due Process: They seek to bypass formal reconsideration processes, advocating for immediate removal pending review, often before books are even read or objections are verified for accuracy[1].
  • Control over Content: Ultimately, their aim is to control the materials available to students, ensuring that only content aligning with their specific ideologies or comfort levels is accessible.

Extremist Real-World Examples

  • The “Banned in the USA” Report by PEN America highlights instances where books are immediately pulled from access pending review, often without due process or even being read. For example, 97 books challenged in October 2022 in Beaufort, South Carolina, were immediately removed and remained inaccessible six months later, illustrating the extremist practice of temporary removal without proper review[1].
  • The Cato Institute’s article, “How to Combat the Biased School Library Book Selection Process”, reflects an extremist motivation by arguing that individuals should be empowered to challenge perceived “biased” book selections, thereby legitimizing demands for temporary removal based on personal objections rather than established policy[2].

Proper Definition:

    
A book challenge is the formal or informal naming of books that someone wants excluded or restricted from a library collection[3][4]. In a formal process, challenged books undergo a reconsideration process in accordance with board-approved policies[3]. Most challenges are resolved through informal discussions with the librarian[5]. Librarians utilize collection development policies to ensure balanced and unbiased selections[3][5]. While libraries do allow parents and the public to question a book’s suitability, the book should typically remain on the shelf during review, presuming the teacher or librarian’s initial selection was valid unless proven otherwise[4][5].

Boiled Down Meaning

A formal request to remove or restrict a book from a library collection, typically followed by a review process.

Examples of Proper Use:

  • “The parent submitted a book challenge to the school board, citing concerns about the age-appropriateness of a novel in the curriculum.”
  • “Florida had more books challenged than any other state last year, according to the American Library Association, indicating a rising trend in attempts to restrict access to materials”[6].
  • “Librarians follow a clear policy for handling book challenges, ensuring a fair and transparent review process before any decision is made to remove or retain a book”[4][5].

Examples of Other Terms:

  • Book ban
  • Book restriction
  • Curation
  • Pornography

Additional Notes

A key distinction often highlighted in discussions about book challenges is the difference between a formal challenge (part of a library’s established review process) and an attempt to circumvent that process by demanding immediate removal. The latter often blurs the line between a challenge and an outright ban.

See also

  • Book ban
  • Book restriction
  • Curation
  • Pornography